3, 2, 1. . .Grr. . .
Jul. 28th, 2008 10:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've replaced our names and e-mails with I and she, but here's our most recent e-mails.
---
I will continue to pray for us all.--mom
---
I will continue to pray for us all.--mom
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:38 AM, I wrote:
Which is made a moot point as long as there's no hope of a real
relationship, which is what I'd see as a real word of encouragement.
-(last name edited)
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:06 AM, she wrote:
> It wasn't meant to solve the problems between you two. The only thing
> it was meant to address were statements (written and verbal) like "He
> doesn't love me" , "Dad doesn't love me" etc. Someone who doesn't
> love you wouldn't care whether you make it safely to Medford. Someone
> who doesn't love you would bitch about his rest being disturbed by the
> phone ringing. --mom
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 2:43 AM, I wrote:
>> Except the stupidity of his killed-off any hope of a relationship. As
>> long as he never recognizes the avoidable harm he inflicted, then I
>> have no reason to believe that he'll never hurt me again.
>>
>> -(last name edited)
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:55 PM, she wrote:
>>> The other night, I was telling your father that I'd seen you on your
>>> way to catch the bus for work. I said that since you'd told me
>>> "Medford", we wouldn't be getting a phone call. He said "I don't mind
>>> the late-night calls because then I know for sure she safely reached
>>> her destination."
>>>
>>> That comment could only have been said by someone who loves you.
>>>
>>> love, mom
>>>
>>
>